Meme Coin Risk Calculator
Evaluate Your Coin's Risk Level
This tool helps identify potential scam tokens based on key technical and market indicators.
Trump Pepe (TRUMPEPE) is a meme cryptocurrency that blends Donald Trump imagery with the popular Pepe the Frog meme. Launched on March 8 2024, the token lives on the Solana blockchain as an SPL token and has been making headlines for its odd decimal setup, suspicious code and wildly fluctuating price. If you’ve stumbled across a random tweet about a "Trump Pepe moon" or a listing on a tiny exchange, you probably have a lot of questions. This guide walks through what the coin actually is, how it works, what the data say, and why most experts treat it as a high‑risk honeypot.
Technical basics - why the token looks weird
The first thing that stands out is the token’s Solana implementation. Unlike typical meme coins that use 9‑18 decimal places, TRUMPEPE is configured with just 1 decimal place. The contract address (Fcc9VgmUHZoGewBqj7PfwagjRkLXUjUniD3wRErMm9XV) lives on Solana’s SPL token registry and can be queried on Solscan. This single‑decimal design is a red flag; security researcher Michael Hiers notes that “tokens with single decimal places on Solana are almost always scams”. The low precision makes it hard for exchanges to display balances correctly and can hide malicious behavior in the contract’s math.
Market data - price, supply and liquidity
As of October 22 2025, the token’s publicly listed numbers differ dramatically between data providers:
- CoinMarketCap: price $0.0000000354, market cap $1.16 M, 21 trillion total supply.
- CoinDesk: price $0.000000000092, virtually zero trading volume.
- CoinGecko: 24‑hour volume $115.81, price $0.0000000000728.
These inconsistencies point to extremely low liquidity. The volume‑to‑market‑cap ratio sits above 29 %, far beyond the healthy 5‑10 % range, suggesting wash‑trading or outright data manipulation. In practice, most exchanges require a minimum $50 deposit of USDT just to open a TRUMPEPE pair, and the token’s price is expressed in scientific notation (e.g., 9.20E‑11 USD per token). Even if you manage to buy a handful, selling it can trigger transaction failures, as users on Reddit and CoinLore have reported.
Security red flags - why the token is labeled a honeypot
Multiple security firms have issued warnings:
- Goplus Security Labs flagged malicious code that blocks sales or causes heavy loss.
- CoinMarketCap’s security alert system shows a “likely honeypot” badge on the TRUMPEPE page.
- Chainalysis reported that 78 % of sub‑$1 M micro‑cap tokens with similar patterns are honeypots.
- CertiK also maintains an active warning, though it has not published a full audit.
In plain language: you can deposit the token, but the contract may reject any attempt to transfer it out, effectively locking your money. That’s why a user on r/CryptoCurrency lost $250 after the token wouldn’t sell and the price crashed 90 % in two hours.
Comparison with other meme coins
| Token | Blockchain | Launch Date | Supply | Price (USD) | Market Cap (USD) | 24‑h Volume (USD) | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUMPEPE | Solana | Mar 2024 | 21 T (trillion) | 0.0000000354 | 1.16 M | ≈ 350 K (max reported) | High (honeypot warnings) |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) | Dogecoin | Dec 2013 | 130 B | 0.079 | 11 B | 1.5 B | Low |
| Shiba Inu (SHIB) | Ethereum | Aug 2020 | 589 T | 0.000010 | 7 B | 300 M | Medium |
| Pepe Coin (PEPE) | Ethereum | Oct 2024 | 50 B | 0.000005 | 250 M | 2 M | Medium‑High |
The contrast is stark. While Dogecoin trades billions in daily volume and enjoys broad exchange support, TRUMPEPE’s highest reported volume is a few hundred thousand dollars, and most major exchanges don’t list it at all. The risk rating reflects the multiple security alerts and the token’s extreme price volatility.
Who should stay away - red‑flag checklist
- Token uses a single decimal place on Solana - a known scam pattern.
- Security firms (Goplus, Chainalysis, CertiK) label it a honeypot.
- No official whitepaper, team information, or verifiable roadmap.
- Liquidity is near zero; most platforms report $0 volume.
- Concentration of supply - 87 % in three wallets.
- Price dropped > 97 % since its August 2024 peak.
If any of these items appear in your due‑diligence, walk away. The token’s profile matches the 99 % failure rate observed for micro‑cap meme coins in 2025.
How to acquire (and why you probably shouldn’t)
For completeness, here’s the typical path described on community forums. Remember, this is **not** a recommendation.
- Open an account on a KYC‑required exchange that lists USDT (e.g., MXC, Binance).
- Deposit at least $50 USDT - the minimum to see TRUMPEPE pairs.
- Swap USDT for TRUMPEPE on the exchange’s SPL market.
- Transfer the tokens to a Solana wallet (Phantom, Solflare) that supports custom SPL tokens.
- Attempt to sell: many users report "transaction failed" errors, and the token often stays locked.
Because the contract may reject outbound transfers, the only realistic exit strategy is to find a buyer on a peer‑to‑peer platform willing to take the risk - essentially a gamble.
Bottom line - quick takeaways
- TRUMPEPE is a Solana‑based meme coin with a single decimal place, a hallmark of scam tokens.
- Multiple security audits flag it as a likely honeypot; selling may be impossible.
- Market data are contradictory and liquidity is negligible.
- Compared with established meme coins, TRUMPEPE offers far higher risk and virtually no upside.
- Unless you enjoy speculative gambling and understand how to recover stuck tokens, avoid it entirely.
Is Trump Pepe a legitimate cryptocurrency?
No. Security analyses from Goplus Security Labs, Chainalysis and CertiK label it as a honeypot with malicious code that blocks sales. There is no public team, roadmap, or verifiable development activity.
Can I safely buy TRUMPEPE on a major exchange?
Major exchanges do not list TRUMPEPE. The few smaller platforms that do require a $50 USDT deposit, and users frequently report transaction failures when trying to sell.
What does the single‑decimal design mean for investors?
A single decimal place is unusual and often used to hide malicious code. It limits precision, makes balances display incorrectly, and is a common indicator of scam tokens on Solana.
How does TRUMPEPE’s price compare to mainstream meme coins?
TRUMPEPE trades at fractions of a cent (≈ 0.00000003 USD) with a market cap of about $1.2 M, whereas Dogecoin sits around $0.08 with an $11 B market cap and billions in daily volume.
Is there any upside potential for short‑sellers?
Some analysts (CoinCodex) predict a short‑selling profit of up to 23 % if you sell before the end of 2025, but the token’s price could also collapse to near zero, making any position extremely risky.
What should I do if I already own TRUMPEPE?
First, verify the token’s contract on Solscan to confirm it’s still there. Then, consider moving it to a private wallet where you control the private keys. If you cannot sell, treat it as a loss and report the incident to the exchange for possible refunds.
johnny garcia
October 22, 2025 AT 10:02 AMIn the grand tapestry of digital assets, the emergence of TRUMPEPE exemplifies a paradox wherein meme culture collides with financial engineering, yielding a vehicle that simultaneously entertains and endangers. Its singular decimal configuration on Solana starkly contrasts the normative precision of reputable tokens, thereby signaling a deviation from conventional design principles. One must therefore regard the token not merely as a novelty but as a specimen of systemic risk, embodying the perils of unvetted code deployment. The confluence of political iconography and amphibian folklore further muddies investors’ discernment, fostering emotional bias over rational analysis. Consequently, prudent participants should apply heightened due‑diligence, scrutinizing audit reports and liquidity metrics before allocating capital. 🚀😊
Ryan Comers
October 22, 2025 AT 10:26 AMThe mainstream hype machines would have you believe that TRUMPEPE is the next meteoric rise, yet the underlying architecture tells a far different story. Its solitary decimal place is not a clever innovation but a camouflage technique widely employed by malicious actors on Solana. Moreover, the token’s liquidity dries up faster than a desert mirage, leaving would‑be buyers stranded with unsellable assets. The so‑called “community” surrounding the coin is often orchestrated, circulating false optimism to lure newcomers. In this light, the project resembles a carnival barker selling sand in the Sahara. 🌪️🦅
Prerna Sahrawat
October 22, 2025 AT 11:00 AMOne might commence an examination of TRUMPEPE by acknowledging its audacious attempt to fuse disparate internet subcultures into a single financial instrument, a venture that, on its surface, appears ingeniously marketable. Yet, the superficial allure quickly yields to an unsettling realization: the token’s technical specifications betray a deliberate obfuscation of standard practices, most notably through its anomalous single‑decimal precision on a blockchain renowned for transparency. This design choice, as identified by multiple security researchers, is not merely unconventional but emblematic of a broader pattern wherein developers seek to obscure transactional mathematics from casual observers. The token’s supply, a staggering twenty‑one trillion units, further compounds the opacity, rendering price calculations unintuitive and fostering an environment ripe for manipulation. In parallel, the divergent price data reported by leading aggregators underscore a systemic inconsistency that erodes confidence in any singular source. When CoinMarketCap displays a price in the order of 10⁻⁸ dollars while CoinGecko lists a markedly divergent figure, the inference is unmistakable: market data are being engineered rather than organically discovered. Such disparities are often symptomatic of wash‑trading schemes, wherein artificial volume is fabricated to fabricate a veneer of legitimacy. Moreover, the token’s market cap, hovering merely above one million dollars, juxtaposed against a purported daily volume of several hundred thousand, yields a volume‑to‑market‑cap ratio that far exceeds normative thresholds, thereby amplifying suspicion. The concentration of token holdings is equally alarming, with a mere trio of wallets possessing the lion’s share of supply, a distribution dynamic that facilitates coordinated price movements and, potentially, abrupt collapses. The token’s contract, according to alerts from Goplus Security Labs and Chainalysis, incorporates mechanisms that can inhibit outbound transfers, effectively ensnaring investor capital in a digital honeypot. This functional restriction is not an inadvertent bug but a deliberate safeguard against liquidation, a hallmark of malicious intent. Users who have attempted to divest from TRUMPEPE report transaction failures, reinforcing the narrative of a lock‑in mechanism that is both technically feasible and ethically indefensible. The absence of a verifiable development roadmap, team disclosures, or whitepaper further accentuates the token’s opacity, denying stakeholders the informational substrates necessary for informed decision‑making. From a comparative perspective, established meme coins such as Dogecoin and Shiba Inu command billions in daily turnover and possess robust exchange listings, attributes starkly absent in the TRUMPEPE ecosystem. Consequently, any perceived upside is not derived from intrinsic utility or community adoption but rather from speculative gambles on price volatility that are, statistically, more likely to culminate in loss than gain. In sum, the confluence of technical irregularities, market data manipulation, concentration of ownership, and confirmed security alerts coalesce to portray TRUMPEPE as a high‑risk instrument whose primary function appears to be the extraction of funds under the guise of meme‑driven enthusiasm.
Joy Garcia
October 22, 2025 AT 11:50 AMFrom a moral standpoint, the spectacle of TRUMPEPE embodies the pernicious tide of digital desolation that threatens to erode the collective conscience of the crypto community. The token’s grotesque amalgamation of political caricature and amphibian satire is not merely frivolous; it serves as a veil for nefarious machinations that prey upon the credulous masses. Behind the lurid memes lies a labyrinthine codebase, riddled with hidden traps designed to ensnare unsuspecting investors. The concentration of supply within a handful of shadowy wallets hints at a coordinated cabal orchestrating price manipulation with ruthless efficiency. Moreover, the absence of transparent governance structures amplifies the sense of an invisible hand guiding the vessel toward inevitable ruin. Vigilance becomes a moral imperative, for to ignore such red flags is to tacitly endorse the erosion of financial integrity. The community must therefore rise, not with reckless antagonism, but with a steadfast commitment to exposing the underlying deceit. In doing so, we uphold the ethical standards that should govern any legitimate financial endeavor.
Ryan Steck
October 22, 2025 AT 12:40 PMYo, this TRUMPEPE thing is definetly a honey pot. The single decimal thing? that's a big red flag, man. They hide the math so you can't see the scam. I've seen it on other micro caps-people lose their cash fast. The code blocks sells, so you end up stuck with a worthless token. Don't fall for the hype, it's just a trap.
Isabelle Filion
October 22, 2025 AT 13:30 PMAh, the ever‑so‑original TRUMPEPE, a masterclass in how not to design a token. One can scarcely contain one's admiration for the sheer ingenuity employed in fabricating a single‑decimal honeypot on Solana. The developers, if we may indulge the term, have demonstrated a commendable commitment to obscurity, thereby ensuring that any diligent investor must resort to a PhD in cryptographic forensics merely to locate the exit. One might even suggest that the token’s market data inconsistencies serve as a delightful puzzle for those with an appetite for futility. How charming that the community embraces such flamboyance while ignoring the glaring red flags. 🎭
PRIYA KUMARI
October 22, 2025 AT 14:20 PMThe risk profile of TRUMPEPE aligns closely with the canonical characteristics of a honeypot, as evidenced by its anomalous decimal precision, concentrated token distribution, and flagged security alerts. Quantitative analysis of its liquidity ratios reveals a volume‑to‑market‑cap disparity exceeding acceptable thresholds by a factor of five, indicative of potential wash‑trading. Furthermore, the lack of an auditable codebase undermines any confidence in transactional integrity. Investors should therefore normalize the probability of loss to near certainty and adjust portfolio exposure accordingly. A prudent stance involves allocating zero capital to this asset class.
Jessica Pence
October 22, 2025 AT 15:10 PMHey folks, just a quick heads‑up if you’re thinking about TRUMPEPE. The token’s price is listed in scientific notation, which can be confusing-make sure you’re not misreading it. Most exchanges that do list it require a $50 USDT minimum deposit, and many users report that the sell function just bounces back with an error. If you already own some, you might want to keep it in a wallet where you control the private keys, just in case. Also, keep an eye on the official alerts from Goplus and CertiK; they’ve flagged it as risky. Stay safe out there! :)
Rebecca Kurz
October 22, 2025 AT 16:00 PMWow!!! This token?!? It’s a total scam!!! The numbers don’t add up!!! Everyone should be aware!!! Don’t even think about buying!!! Seriously!!! The risks are off the charts!!! Protect your money!!! Stay alert!!!
Nikhil Chakravarthi Darapu
October 22, 2025 AT 16:50 PMFrom a patriotic perspective, it is disheartening to witness domestic investors being lured into schemes like TRUMPEPE, which undermine the credibility of our nation's emerging fintech sector. The token's architecture exhibits classic hallmarks of a fraudulent design, notably the single‑decimal configuration and opaque liquidity pools. Such projects not only jeopardize individual capital but also tarnish the reputation of legitimate American blockchain initiatives. It is incumbent upon citizens to demand greater regulatory oversight and to support ventures that demonstrate transparent governance and robust security practices.
Tiffany Amspacher
October 22, 2025 AT 17:40 PMIsn't it fascinating how TRUMPEPE tries to sell you a dream wrapped in a meme, yet the underlying code whispers a different story? One could argue that the token embodies the very paradox of modern finance: dazzling surface, hollow foundation. If we look beyond the glitz, we see a pattern that repeats across countless projects-promises of moon trips that never launch. Perhaps the lesson here is to question the narrative before we surrender our hard‑earned dollars to the siren song of internet hype.
Ty Hoffer Houston
October 22, 2025 AT 18:30 PMThanks for shedding light on the absurdities of TRUMPEPE. I totally agree that the token’s design choices raise serious concerns, especially the single‑decimal gimmick that feels more like a smoke screen than innovation. It's tough seeing investors get caught up in the hype without recognizing these red flags. I hope more people take a step back and evaluate the fundamentals before diving in.
James Williams, III
October 22, 2025 AT 19:20 PMIndeed, the token's lack of liquidity depth and anomalous decimal scaling constitute a classic case of protocol-level vulnerability exploitation. From a market‑microstructure standpoint, the apparent wash‑trading activity skews order book integrity, rendering price discovery essentially meaningless. This environment incentivizes predatory actors to capitalize on arbitrage opportunities that are, in reality, engineered traps. As such, any capital allocation towards TRUMPEPE would be statistically exposed to adverse selection risk.
Patrick Day
October 22, 2025 AT 20:10 PMWhat they don't tell you is that the whole wash‑trading facade is orchestrated by shadowy entities pulling strings behind the scenes. The pattern matches previous coordinated pump‑and‑dump operations linked to off‑shore groups with deep pockets. Their goal is to siphon retail funds while keeping the market narrative clean. Keep your eyes open; the real culprits operate in the dark.
Mike Cristobal
October 22, 2025 AT 21:00 PMEthics demand we stay away from such scams. 😊