ATOMARS Trading Fee Calculator
Calculate Your Trading Fee
See how much you'll pay in fees on ATOMARS compared to other exchanges.
Your Trading Fees
ATOMARS
Flat 0.20% fee
$0.00
Compare to Other Exchanges
0.10% - 0.20% (maker-taker)
0.60% flat
0.16% - 0.26% tiered
0.20% flat
Note: Fees shown are for standard spot trades. Binance fees vary based on maker/taker status and trading volume.
ATOMARS Crypto Exchange is a digital trading platform that aims to give crypto enthusiasts a straightforward way to buy, sell, and swap coins through both desktop and mobile interfaces. Launched sometime before 2023 and operating under the domain atomars.us.com, the exchange markets itself as a lowâfee option with a flat 0.20% trading charge. This review breaks down what youâll actually experience on ATOMARS, from fee structures to security claims, and compares it to the heavyweights like Binance and Coinbase.
Fee Structure - What You Pay per Trade
Most traders start by looking at fees because they directly affect profit margins. ATOMARS keeps it simple: every trade, whether youâre buying Bitcoin or a brandânew altcoin, incurs a 0.20% flat fee. There are no makerâtaker tiers, no hidden withdrawal costs mentioned on the public pages, and no premiumâaccount discounts. For a $10,000 trade, youâll lose $20 in fees.
Hereâs how that stacks up against three wellâknown rivals:
| Exchange | Fee Model | Typical Fee % |
|---|---|---|
| ATOMARS Crypto Exchange | Flat | 0.20% |
| Binance | Makerâtaker tiered | 0.10% - 0.20% |
| Coinbase | Flat (standard) | 0.60% |
| Kraken | Tiered | 0.16% - 0.26% |
In raw numbers, ATOMARS sits between Binanceâs bestâcase 0.10% and Coinbaseâs 0.60%. If you trade large volumes, Binanceâs tiered system can beat the flat 0.20% fee, but for casual traders the simplicity of ATOMARS is attractive.
Security Claims - How Safe Is Your Money?
Security is the elephant in every cryptoâexchange conversation. ATOMARSâ public documents, notably its Privacy Portal, promise ârobust measures to protect your data from loss, misuse, or unauthorized access.â However, the platform stops short of publishing a technical whitepaper, encryption standards, or coldâstorage ratios.
What does the fine print say? The Terms of Service (Sept 15 2023) place a lot of responsibility on users: âusers are solely responsible for taking necessary security measures to protect the security of your Collateral Account and personal information.â This mirrors the selfâcustody model many smaller exchanges adopt.
Industry experts such as Kudelski Security stress that most breaches arise from weak authentication or compromised web interfaces, not the blockchain itself. Since ATOMARS does not disclose multiâfactor authentication (MFA) defaults, hardwareâwallet integration, or coldâstorage percentages, itâs hard to benchmark against exchanges that publish such details (e.g., Gemini or Coinbase).
In short, the exchange promises basic protection, but the lack of transparent security architecture makes it a riskier choice for largeâscale holders.
Platform & Usability - Desktop and Mobile Experience
Users on Revain.org consistently mention that ATOMARS offers both a desktop web UI and a mobile app. The design is clean, with a typical orderâbook view, charting, and quickâswap buttons. However, the platform does not provide advanced charting tools (e.g., multiple indicators, drawing tools) that power traders expect from Binance or Kraken.
Learning curve appears shallow: new users can create an account, verify identity (KYC) in under 15 minutes, and start trading. That said, the help center is sparse; there are no extensive tutorials, webinars, or a knowledge base comparable to Binance Academyâs 500+ articles.
Customer support seems limited to email and a basic ticket system. The site does not list a liveâchat option, which can be a drawback during urgent market moves.
Coin Listings & Liquidity - What Can You Trade?
ATOMARS markets itself as ânew coin friendly.â Reviewers note that the exchange frequently adds emerging altcoins that larger platforms delay. This can be appealing for traders chasing earlyâstage projects.
Liquidity, however, is a different story. The exchange does not publish 24âhour volume, orderâbook depth, or marketâmaking partnerships. In practice, thin books have been reported for lowerâcap tokens, resulting in slippage. For highâvolume pairs like BTC/USDT, the platform appears to route orders through external liquidity providers, but the exact mechanism is undisclosed.
If you need deep liquidity for large trades, youâll likely find more reliable execution on Binance or Coinbase.
Regulatory Footprint - Licenses and Compliance
Regulatory clarity is a growing concern for crypto platforms. ATOMARS does not display any moneyâtransmitter licenses, no FinCEN registration, and no jurisdictional disclosures on its website. Compare this with Bitstamp, which openly lists 26 regulatory licences, or Coinbase, which files regular SEC reports.
In regions tightening crypto oversight (e.g., the United States, EU), the lack of visible compliance could limit ATOMARSâ ability to onboard institutional users or offer fiat onâramps.
Strengths, Weaknesses & Who Should Consider ATOMARS
- Strengths
- Straightforward 0.20% flat fee - easy to calculate.
- Mobile app available for onâtheâgo trading.
- Frequent listings of new, lowâcap tokens.
- Weaknesses
- Limited transparency on security architecture and coldâstorage.
- No published regulatory licences or compliance reports.
- Thin liquidity for many assets, leading to slippage.
- Sparse educational resources and customerâsupport channels.
- Best for
- Retail traders who prioritize simplicity over advanced tools.
- Users interested in experimenting with newly listed altcoins.
- Not ideal for
- Highâvolume traders needing deep order books.
- Institutions or users who require proven regulatory compliance.
- Anyone storing large sums without extra security guarantees.
Verdict - Is ATOMARS Worth Your Time?
ATOMARS fills a niche: a lowâfee, mobileâfirst exchange that quickly adds new tokens. If youâre a hobbyist looking to dabble with the latest projects and donât need heavyweight charting or institutionalâgrade security, the platform can be an affordable sandbox.
However, the lack of clear security disclosures, regulatory licensing, and deep liquidity means you should approach it with caution. Treat it as a secondary account for smallâscale experiments, not your primary vault for large holdings.
Quick FAQs
What is the trading fee on ATOMARS?
ATOMARS charges a flat 0.20% fee on every spot trade, with no makerâtaker distinction.
Does ATOMARS offer fiat deposits?
Public information does not list any fiatâonâramp options; the platform appears to be cryptoâonly.
How secure is the exchange?
ATOMARS claims robust data protection, but it does not publish details on encryption, multiâfactor authentication, or coldâstorage percentages, so users must add their own security layers.
Can I trade on ATOMARS via a mobile app?
Yes, the exchange provides a mobile app for both iOS and Android, allowing you to place orders, view balances, and check market data on the go.
Is ATOMARS regulated?
The exchange does not publicly display any regulatory licenses or compliance certificates, making its regulatory status unclear.
Stephanie Alya
October 24, 2025 AT 08:43 AMFlat 0.20% fee? Groundbreaking. đ
Manish Gupta
October 30, 2025 AT 02:36 AMThe platform mentions basic data protection, but it never clarifies whether multiâfactor authentication is enabled by default :) This omission can leave accounts vulnerable to phishing attacks, especially when users rely solely on passwords. Implementing hardwareâwallet support would dramatically improve security posture, yet ATOMARS provides no clear integration path.
Gabrielle Loeser
November 4, 2025 AT 21:29 PMThe regulatory landscape for crypto exchanges has become increasingly intricate over the past few years.
In jurisdictions such as the United States and the European Union, operators are expected to obtain specific moneyâtransmitter licenses and comply with antiâmoneyâlaundering (AML) reporting standards.
The ATOMARS platform, as described in the review, does not publish any such licensure information on its website.
This omission makes it difficult for potential users to assess whether the exchange meets the baseline compliance requirements enforced by regulators.
Moreover, the lack of a visible FinCEN registration number raises concerns for U.S. residents who must adhere to strict reporting obligations.
Institutional investors typically demand thirdâparty audits and attestations, which serve as a safeguard against operational and custodial risks.
Without publicly available audit reports, ATOMARS cannot demonstrate the same level of transparency that competitors like Coinbase or Kraken provide.
The exchangeâs Terms of Service place a heavy burden on users to secure their own accounts, a model that is acceptable for hobbyist traders but not for entities subject to fiduciary duties.
From a legal standpoint, the absence of disclosed regulatory oversight could also expose ATOMARS to enforcement actions should authorities decide to scrutinize unlicensed crypto service providers.
Users operating in regions with stringent licensing regimes may find their accounts frozen or terminated without recourse.
Additionally, the lack of a clear jurisdictional framework complicates tax reporting for individuals and businesses alike.
In practice, many exchanges mitigate this risk by partnering with licensed custodians, thereby offloading part of the compliance burden.
ATOMARS does not appear to have such partnerships, which further amplifies the regulatory uncertainty.
Prospective traders should therefore conduct thorough due diligence, possibly consulting legal counsel before committing significant capital to the platform.
In summary, while the exchange offers attractive fee simplicity, its opaque regulatory posture represents a material risk factor for users who prioritize compliance and legal certainty.
Abby Gonzales Hoffman
November 10, 2025 AT 16:23 PMGreat points on the compliance side!âŻEven if the fee structure is simple, the hidden regulatory risks can bite you when you least expect it.âŻIf youâre just dabbling, treat ATOMARS as a sandbox, but never store your life savings there.âŻAlways keep a backup on a hardware wallet and consider moving larger positions to a fully regulated exchange.
Prabhleen Bhatti
November 16, 2025 AT 11:16 AMAlright folks, letâs dissect the fee paradigm â the 0.20% flat rate is unquestionably *transparent*, yet it borders on the *mediocre* when juxtaposed against tiered giants like Binance that can dip below 0.10% for highâvolume leviathans!; the *simplicity* of a singleâdigit charge may entice retail users, but seasoned marketâmakers will inevitably gravitate towards platforms offering volumeâbased rebates.
Security-wise, the absence of explicit MFA deployment and coldâstorage ratios is not merely a *gap*; itâs a glaring red flag that could erode user confidence! Moreover, the Terms of Service's heavy reliance on userâside security measures effectively transfers custodial risk onto the endâconsumer, a practice that many regulators frown upon.
Liquidity paucity for nascent altcoins further compounds the conundrum â thin order books translate to slippage, especially during volatile market swings.
Regulatory opacity, too, cannot be dismissed: no disclosed licenses mean uncertain jurisdictional oversight, which may affect fiat onâramps and AML compliance.
In sum, ATOMARS is a **doubleâedged sword**: appealing for lowâfee, experimental trades, yet fraught with systemic risk factors that could jeopardize substantial holdings.
John E Owren
November 22, 2025 AT 06:09 AMThanks for breaking that down. Users should definitely weigh the fee benefits against the security and liquidity drawbacks before allocating significant capital.
LeAnn Dolly-Powell
November 28, 2025 AT 01:03 AMLove the energy here! đ If youâre just testing the waters, ATOMARS can be a fun playground, but always keep your main stash on a more secure, regulated platform. đâ¨
Anastasia Alamanou
December 3, 2025 AT 19:56 PMFrom a holistic perspective, the exchangeâs UI simplicity aligns with the onboarding expectations of novice traders, yet the paucity of advanced analytical tools may hinder technical analysis workflows. Consequently, users seeking comprehensive charting suites might experience friction.
Rohit Sreenath
December 9, 2025 AT 14:49 PMThe thin liquidity on lowâcap tokens is a real problem; slippage can wipe out any potential gains.
Sam Kessler
December 15, 2025 AT 09:43 AMOne must consider the broader geopolitical context: many soâcalled âcryptoâonlyâ platforms operate in jurisdictions that lack stringent oversight, creating a fertile ground for shadow banking activities. The absence of licensing on ATOMARS suggests a deliberate attempt to skirt regulatory scrutiny, which could be symptomatic of deeper systemic vulnerabilities. Not to mention, the opaque custodial practices may be leveraged for covert asset manipulation or even illicit financing. Users should remain vigilant, as the platformâs lowâfee façade might serve as a lure for unsuspecting retail participants while sophisticated actors exploit the regulatory blind spots.
Steve Roberts
December 21, 2025 AT 04:36 AMWhile conspiracies abound, the practical takeaway is simple: verify licensing before trusting any exchange with sizable funds.
Aniket Sable
December 26, 2025 AT 23:29 PMHey everyone, just a quick reminder to keep a small amount on ATOMARS for testing new coins, but move the rest to a hardware wallet. Itâs always better to be safe than sorry!
Santosh harnaval
January 1, 2026 AT 18:23 PMSimple: use ATOMARS for experimentation only.