NDQ Potential Loss Calculator
Calculate your potential losses from trading the Nasdaq666 (NDQ) meme coin scam. Based on the article, NDQ has extreme slippage, near-zero liquidity, and is a known pump-and-dump scheme. This calculator estimates losses based on typical market conditions for this scam token.
There’s no such thing as a legitimate cryptocurrency called Nasdaq666 (NDQ) tied to the Nasdaq stock exchange. None. Zero. It’s a meme coin built on deception, wrapped in AI buzzwords, and designed to trick retail investors into buying a digital asset with no value, no team, and no future.
It’s not affiliated with Nasdaq - and that’s the point
The name ‘Nasdaq666’ is a classic brandjacking tactic. Nasdaq is a real, regulated stock exchange worth trillions. It has offices in New York, London, and Singapore. It lists Apple, Amazon, and Tesla. Nasdaq666 has none of that. It’s a BNB Chain token with a contract address on Binance Smart Chain: 0x4aCb4CC1f0A073ce4BDe893fAebc726198c14444. The ‘666’? That’s just shock value - a cheap trick to grab attention in a sea of meme coins. The project doesn’t just borrow the name - it exploits it. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has repeatedly warned about tokens using names like ‘Bitcoin,’ ‘Nasdaq,’ or ‘Tesla’ to mislead people. This is one of those cases.
Meet Elara Moon - the AI fox that doesn’t exist
The creators claim NDQ is powered by AI and built around a fictional nine-tailed fox named Elara Moon. They say she’s a ‘meme icon’ and that the project is about ‘creating trends, not chasing them.’ Sounds cool, right? Except there’s no AI. No code. No algorithm. No public whitepaper. No GitHub repo. No team members. Just a website with stock images of a cartoon fox and vague marketing fluff copied from other meme coin scams. The ‘AI’ part is pure theater. It’s the same trick used by dozens of low-cap tokens in 2023: throw in ‘AI,’ ‘metaverse,’ or ‘Web3’ and hope people think it’s innovative. It’s not. It’s just noise.
Price? Volatility? Liquidity? All rigged
NDQ’s price swings like a pendulum in a hurricane. On some exchanges, it’s listed at $0.0011. On others, it’s $0.00003. Why? Because liquidity is a joke. CoinMarketCap reported a 24-hour trading volume of $200,000 against a market cap of just $44,000 - that’s a volume-to-market-cap ratio of over 450%. That’s not organic trading. That’s wash trading. That’s bots buying and selling to each other to fake activity. Real projects have volume under 100% of market cap. Anything above 100% is a red flag. CertiK and CoinScan both say tokens with ratios this high have a 92% chance of crashing within six months. NDQ hit an all-time high of $0.047 - that’s 99% down from where it peaked. If you bought at the top, you’re underwater by nearly $11,000 per 1 million tokens.
People are losing money - fast
Reddit users are calling it a ‘plague.’ Trustpilot has 12 reviews with a 1.2/5 rating. One user posted: ‘Bought at $0.0011, tried to sell two hours later - price dropped to $0.0003. Slippage was insane.’ Another said they tried to sell 10 million NDQ tokens and got only $3,200 back instead of $11,000. Why? Because there’s almost no buyers. The liquidity depth is near zero. When you try to sell, you’re forced to accept a terrible price because no one else is buying. That’s not market dynamics - that’s a trap. The Telegram group has 1,247 members, but 90% of the messages are pump signals and referral links. No one talks about the tech. No one talks about the future. Just ‘BUY NOW’ and ‘100x coming.’
No development. No updates. Just silence
Check BscScan. The smart contract hasn’t been touched since it was deployed. No code updates. No new features. No AI integration. Nothing. The Twitter account @NDQ666_BSC has posted 12 times since September 2023 - mostly price alerts and memes. The Telegram group activity dropped from 8.7 messages per hour in October to just 3.2 in November. That’s not a project fading - that’s a scam collapsing. Delphi Digital’s report says meme coins like this typically lose 90-99% of their value within 90 days. NDQ is already past that point. The team? Anonymous. The roadmap? Nonexistent. The community? Just a bunch of people who got sucked in by a flashy name and a cartoon fox.
Where can you trade it? And should you?
You can buy NDQ on PancakeSwap v2 or KCEX. But here’s the catch: you need a crypto wallet like MetaMask, BNB for gas fees, and the guts to risk your money on a token with no utility, no team, and no future. Even if you think you’re smart enough to ‘buy low, sell high,’ the slippage and lack of buyers make it nearly impossible to exit without massive losses. The only people winning are the ones who sold early - the insiders who dumped their tokens before the public bought in. That’s how every pump-and-dump works.
Why does this even exist?
Because it’s profitable. For someone. Meme coins with market caps under $100,000 make up 63% of all pump-and-dump schemes on decentralized exchanges, according to Chainalysis. The creators don’t care if you lose. They just need you to buy. They make money from the initial hype, the trading fees, and the referral links. They’re not building a blockchain project. They’re running a digital casino with fake odds. And the house always wins.
Bottom line: Don’t touch it
Nasdaq666 (NDQ) isn’t an investment. It’s a warning sign. It’s a textbook example of how crypto scams are evolving - using AI jargon, fake characters, and brand names to look legit. There’s no utility. No development. No transparency. Just volatility, slippage, and lost money. If you’re looking to invest in crypto, stick to projects with public teams, open-source code, real use cases, and transparent roadmaps. NDQ has none of that. It’s not a coin. It’s a trap.
Is Nasdaq666 (NDQ) a real cryptocurrency backed by Nasdaq?
No. Nasdaq666 has no connection to the Nasdaq stock exchange. The name is deliberately misleading to trick investors into thinking it’s affiliated with a major financial institution. It’s a meme coin on the BNB Chain with zero official ties to Nasdaq.
Can I make money trading NDQ?
Technically, yes - if you’re one of the first people to buy and sell before the crash. But for 99% of people who buy NDQ now, the answer is no. The token has extreme slippage, near-zero liquidity, and no buyers. Most users report losing 70-90% of their investment within hours. It’s not trading - it’s gambling.
Does NDQ have AI technology like it claims?
No. The AI claims are purely marketing. There’s no public code, no AI model, no developer activity, and no technical documentation. Blockchain explorers show zero contract changes since launch. The ‘AI-powered meme creation’ is fiction designed to sound impressive.
Where can I buy or sell NDQ?
You can trade NDQ on decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap v2 or centralized exchanges like KCEX. But be warned: liquidity is extremely low. Selling often results in massive price slippage - you might get only 30% of what you expect. Always use a wallet like MetaMask and have BNB for gas fees.
Is Nasdaq666 a scam?
Yes, by all industry standards. It has an anonymous team, no utility, fake AI claims, extreme price manipulation, and a volume-to-market-cap ratio that’s 450% higher than safe levels. Trustpilot, Reddit, and blockchain analysts all flag it as a high-risk scam. The SEC has warned against tokens that impersonate real brands - this is one of them.
Vanshika Bahiya
November 14, 2025 AT 23:42 PMWow, this breakdown is exactly what new crypto folks need to see. I've seen so many people get burned by these fake 'Nasdaq' coins - it's heartbreaking. Always check the contract address, verify the team, and if there's no GitHub or whitepaper, walk away. You're not missing out - you're avoiding a trap. I teach this in my beginner crypto workshops and this post is perfect for sharing.
Also, the 450% volume-to-market-cap ratio? That's a red flag so bright it should be a warning siren. If you're new, just remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it's probably a pump-and-dump with a cartoon fox.
Stay safe out there, everyone.
Albert Melkonian
November 15, 2025 AT 18:33 PMThank you for this meticulously researched and thoroughly documented analysis. The distinction between brandjacking and legitimate innovation is not merely semantic - it is a foundational ethical boundary in financial markets. The deliberate exploitation of institutional credibility to attract retail capital constitutes a form of market manipulation that undermines trust in decentralized finance as a whole.
Furthermore, the absence of verifiable technical development, the use of fictional AI entities, and the reliance on emotional triggers such as the number 666 are textbook indicators of predatory financial products. This case exemplifies why regulatory clarity and investor education must be prioritized in emerging asset classes.
One hopes that such disclosures will serve as a deterrent to future bad actors.
Byron Kelleher
November 16, 2025 AT 07:53 AMMan, I wish I’d seen this before I lost my rent money on NDQ last month 😅
Woke up one day thinking ‘AI fox’ sounded cool, bought in at $0.001, thought I was gonna be rich by Friday. Turned out the only thing being created was a new kind of pain.
Turns out ‘Elara Moon’ doesn’t exist - and neither does my wallet balance.
Lesson learned. Never trust a token with a cartoon animal and zero code updates. Thanks for the reality check.
Anthony Forsythe
November 17, 2025 AT 03:32 AMLet us contemplate, dear seekers of digital fortune, the grotesque theater of modern finance - where a name stolen from the hallowed halls of Wall Street, draped in the occult symbolism of 666, and animated by the ghost of a nine-tailed fox conjured from Midjourney prompts, becomes a vessel for the collective delusion of the desperate.
Is this not the modern mythos? A religion without gods, only contracts. A prophecy without prophets, only bots. A temple built not of stone, but of slippage and shattered dreams.
The creators do not build. They harvest. They do not innovate. They exploit. They do not lead. They lure. And we - oh, we, the faithful fools - rush in with our MetaMasks and our BNB, whispering prayers to the blockchain gods, begging for a 100x miracle… only to be swallowed by the void of zero liquidity.
Elara Moon does not exist. But the hunger she feeds? That is very, very real.
Kandice Dondona
November 17, 2025 AT 09:50 AMYES YES YES 💯 this is exactly what I’ve been screaming into the void for months!!
That cartoon fox? I thought it was cute at first 😅 then I realized it’s the same image used on 12 other scam coins.
And the ‘AI’? Bro, the only intelligence here is the algorithm that tells you to ‘BUY NOW’ every 17 minutes.
Thank you for saying it like it is. I shared this with my sister who just bought NDQ - she’s cashing out now 🙏❤️
Stay woke, stay safe, and NEVER trust a name that sounds like a horror movie title.
Becky Shea Cafouros
November 18, 2025 AT 18:42 PMSo… it’s a scam.
Got it.
Thanks for the novel.
Drew Monrad
November 20, 2025 AT 01:49 AMWow. So you’re saying the entire crypto space is a scam? Because if this is a scam, then so is Bitcoin. So is Ethereum. So is every token that ever had a whitepaper written by a guy who dropped out of college.
Maybe the real scam is believing that ‘legitimacy’ is defined by corporate names and SEC approvals. Maybe the fox is the only honest thing here - she doesn’t pretend to be anything she’s not. She’s a meme. And memes are truth.
You’re just mad because you didn’t get in early.
Also, Nasdaq is a monopoly. Why should we respect it?
Cody Leach
November 20, 2025 AT 15:11 PMThanks for the detailed breakdown. I’ve been watching NDQ for weeks and was about to dip in - this saved me.
The volume-to-market-cap ratio is the dead giveaway. Real projects don’t need to fake activity that hard. And the fact that the contract hasn’t been touched since launch? That’s not neglect - that’s intent.
Good call on the Telegram activity drop too. That’s the quiet death of a scam. No fanfare. Just silence.
Appreciate the clarity.